Built artefactKPIs, Definitions & Data Quality

Data-Quality Checks Example

Python-generated checks report for making missing values, duplicate records, reconciliation differences, refresh timing and review status visible before figures are discussed.

Python generated data-quality checks report showing source record count, field profile, missing values, duplicate records, reconciliation differences, stale refresh checks, exception rows and review status
Python data-quality assetOpen preview image

Demonstration work only. Built with synthetic data. Not a client notebook, client system or Power BI screenshot, and no protected data is used.

Environment
Python / Data-quality checks
Preview shown
Python script output
Demo status
Built artefact
Artefact source
demos/python-data-quality-profiling/

What this example shows

Who the artefact is for and what review question it is designed to answer.

Audience

Reporting analystsData ownersFinance teamsOperations teams

Current setup

Figures are prepared from source exports, but missing values, duplicate records, reconciliation differences and refresh timing are not visible before the review meeting.

Review question

Which source records, fields or exceptions need checking before the figures are discussed?

What a client could receive

A finished Python-generated checks report showing source record counts, field profile, missing values, duplicate IDs, reconciliation differences, stale refresh checks, exception rows and review status.

How this could be used

A real build would be agreed around your data, users, refresh needs and review questions.

Pages, filters and measures would be shaped around the data sources, refresh rhythm and audience for the final output.

The first review would agree which figures need checking, which questions the output must answer and what maintenance notes are needed.

The finished artefact can stay focused for leadership review or expand into a multi-page model where that is useful.

Questions it helps answer

Practical questions this pattern could help a team discuss.

Missing values

Flagged

Shows where required fields are absent or incomplete

Unmatched records

Reviewed

Highlights records that fail source matching or reconciliation

Review status

Tracked

Separates completed checks from items still needing attention

Data and delivery notes

The example shows the artefact without exposing real business data.

What gets reviewed

  • Field profile
  • Missing-field review
  • Duplicate review
  • Refresh status
  • Reconciliation points
  • Exception summary
  • Review status

Data sources

Python script outputCSV exportsExcelSQLPower BI where appropriate

Next step

Discuss data-quality review

Quanta Meridian can review the source data, report structure, measures, checking points, documentation and whether Power BI, Excel or process improvement is the right route.