Pass
The observed result met the agreed threshold.
Retain the run result and continue.Data Quality
For reporting, data and operational teams that need to decide whether a scheduled report can be issued, limited or held.
Quanta Meridian shows which order or delivery row failed, which service or supplier result would be wrong, who must correct the customer or product record and what the independent retest found.
When data needs a controlled response
A delivered order with no customer code cannot be assigned to the customer group used in the monthly service report. An unknown product code can remove a complete supplier category from the monthly score.
A count of failed references is not enough. The reporting analyst needs the affected order keys, the result that would be wrong and the data owner who can correct the customer or product table.
The row remains held until the same rule runs again. The original failure, corrected customer or product record, independent retest and release decision stay connected for the reporting owner.
Rules test the batch in order. Material failures retain their record keys, affected report and owner, then return through the same rule for retest.
Columns · types · keys
Required · unique · timely
Sequence · references · totals
Release only after all 15 checks pass
Record key · rule · value · expected condition
Customer, product and on-time delivery results
Evidence and target retest remain in history
Columns · types · keys
Required · unique · timely
Sequence · references · totals
Assign an owner only when the threshold or impact warrants it.
Result states
Status is written as text and paired with its consequence. Colour is used only to help scanning.
The observed result met the agreed threshold.
Retain the run result and continue.The result needs review but does not automatically block the report.
Assess impact and record any limitation.The observed result breached the threshold for this reporting purpose.
Hold or limit the affected report and assign the failed rows as agreed.The check did not complete, so it cannot support a quality conclusion.
Resolve the execution problem and run it again.Data-quality review history
The same configured check is used for the first run and retest so the correction can be compared with the observed failure.
Each check names the order or delivery fields tested, the threshold and the report consequence. The run keeps its input period, identifier, time, observed result and failed record keys.
A missing customer code is assigned to the customer-data owner; a missing product mapping goes to the product-data owner. The reporting owner records whether the affected page is held or issued with a stated limitation.
After the customer, product or delivery record is corrected, the same rule is run again by a second analyst. Only a passing retest and reconciled row total allow the held row or report page to return.
Check result and incident
It records the rule, threshold and severity alongside the input, run time and result state. Failed record keys retain the observed values and show which measure or report is affected.
It adds impact, urgency and recurrence, then keeps the data owner’s response, correction or accepted limitation. Retest evidence supports the final closure decision and history.
The check and retest package
Agree what should be tested and what each result means for the reporting purpose.
The retained package contains rule, severity and threshold register and dataset, field and affected-report mapping.
Retain the run and the records needed to explain where the data failed.
The retained package contains configuration-driven SQL or Python checks and run metadata, failed records and quarantine table.
Connect material failures to an owner, a reporting decision and evidence from the retest.
The retained package contains issue or accepted-limitation record and named owner, retest history and readiness decision.
Executable project evidence
The retained builds cover validation, issue history, SQL controls and metric reconciliation. Their project pages explain the input records, execution, tie-out and limitation behind each view.
Executed rule results

A repeatable set of checks that stops incomplete or contradictory order records from entering the monthly service report and gives each failed row a specific correction reason.
The initial run separates 15 failures, three warnings and one execution error. Each row also retains the affected report section and correction reason.Inspect this projectOne reporting incident from detection to release

A reporting data incident register that starts with a retained failed row and ends with verified closure, an approved limitation or a continued hold.
PRD-UNKNOWN is replaced by PRD-01001. The retained SQL returns Product category 06 and PASS before the reporting owner releases the corrected report.Inspect this projectExecuted mart and release results

A wholesale reporting mart built from Microsoft’s Wide World Importers sample database so sales, purchasing, stock and margin reports use the same customers, products, dates and totals.
The retained result combines the actual query result with the release decision. It shows what loaded, what the latest monthly mart contains and whether the checks allow publication.Inspect this projectExact percentage bridge

A row-level reconciliation explaining why the SQL reporting mart, Power BI model, Excel management pack, operational extract and manually maintained report show different on-time delivery percentages.
Calculation, event-date, record-grain and extract-population adjustments bring every reported version to the same numerator and denominator with no residual.Inspect this projectTechnical patterns
Columns, types, keys or file structures must remain stable enough for the next process to run.
A valid structure does not show that the values are complete, timely or meaningful for the report.
Records need tests for completeness, uniqueness, validity, freshness, sequence or reference integrity.
Thresholds must reflect the reporting purpose; a universal quality score cannot make that decision.
Amounts, populations or states must reconcile to an agreed definition before a report can be issued.
The rule needs a business owner and must not silently replace a disputed definition.
A recurring or material failure needs ownership, impact assessment, a recorded data correction and independent retest.
Minor warnings can remain check results. Creating an incident for every failed row adds noise without improving the data.
Related capabilities
Python turns a reporting check into an executable rule that retains the failed rows, run time, affected report and later retest.
See how it is used in projectsSQL gives invoice lines, orders, receipts and reference data a declared grain before they become shared reporting totals.
See how it is used in projectsExcel and Power Query are used when people need a familiar workbook without hiding file intake, transformation logic, adjustments or checks.
See how it is used in projectsEvidence boundary
Checks test observed data against agreed rules. They do not prove that unobserved real-world activity is complete, and a failed check becomes an incident only when its threshold or reporting impact warrants managed resolution.
Bring one report, the records that cause concern and the decision due next. Confidential or protected data is not needed for the first conversation.
Discuss a data-quality reviewReturn to all solutions